The standard quality assurance process in scholarly journals is peer review. Scientists in the same field as the authors ("peers") carefully examine submitted manuscripts for weaknesses and ambiguities.

The impact factor is a scientometric indicator published by Clarivate Analytics. It measures the yearly average number of citations to documents published in a journal.

The Quality Assurance Process

A quality assurance (QA) process is an organized way to manage processes. It includes the setting of standards for measuring performance and identifying opportunities for improvement. It also involves the development of testing procedures and tools. It benefits an organization by keeping projects on track and ensuring consistent quality throughout production.

For example, QAs can help ensure that software is developed according to specifications by creating tests that check for bugs. This helps prevent defects in a finished product that may cost the company money to fix.

Additionally, a QA team can help make sure that all operational units are complying with the Company’s quality systems, good working practices including GxPs, and local, national, regional and international legal, ethical and regulatory standards. It can also play a key role in dealing with scientific misconduct and fraud by providing support and guidance to employees across the globe. The company can then build on the knowledge gained from these experiences to develop a more robust and efficient quality assurance system. Check out here to know more details about Q1 journals list.

The Editorial Board

Journals rely on their editorial board to help identify high quality papers, ensure academic aptitude and foster enthusiasm for the journal. As such, editorial boards should represent a wide range of locations, academic credentials and research interests in the journal’s main discipline.

The board should also be able to provide guidance on journal policy and scope. It should also be able to assist with the review of submitted manuscripts and advise on the journal’s peer review process.

Lastly, the editorial board should be able to endorse the journal and its submission policies to colleagues in order to encourage submissions to the journal. In addition, they should be willing to contribute frequent and thoughtful editorials that add context and significance to the journal for readers and authors alike.

The names and institutional affiliations – including country/region - of all Editorial Team Members should be clearly identified on the Journal homepage. Persistent digital identifiers (such as ResearcherID or ORCID) or links to institutional profiles should be provided when possible.

The Publication Process

In the long tradition of science, research results are distilled into a journal paper or book that is then peer reviewed, edited, published, and made available in libraries. This process is not fast, and there has been considerable discussion about whether it needs to be sped up.

When a journal receives a submission, it is screened by an editor with subject expertise to determine whether the paper falls within the scope of the journal and can potentially meet publication requirements. Occasionally, the editor may consult the editorial board at this stage and ask for further information or minor edits.

Once the editor has a decision to make, they will provide the author with a provisional acceptance letter along with any requests they have. After the author has fulfilled any requested changes, a technical editor will assess the submission to ensure it meets publication standards and that the scientific content has been approved through peer review.

The Impact Factor

The Impact Factor is the most widely-known and well-respected metric for journal rankings. Developed by Eugene Garfield, the founder of ISI (Institute for Scientific Information), it measures the frequency with which journals are cited in the past two years. It is calculated by dividing the number of articles cited in a year by the number of articles published in that same year. Other journal-level metrics, such as the h-index and CiteScore, are also available.

Journals that publish more review articles tend to have higher impact factors. However, the impact factor should be considered with other factors in mind when evaluating research.

One important consideration is the discipline. Journals in different fields tend to be cited differently. For example, journals in astronomy may have lower impact factors than journals in fluid dynamics. This shouldn’t be taken as a sign that a journal is not reputable or worthy of publishing in. It is important to consider the aims and scope of the journal in question when determining which journals to publish in.